Wednesday, June 07, 2006

June 7 Madhesi Rally In Janakpur





Madhesis demand immediate citizenship NepalNews

Thousands of Madhesi demonstrated today in janakpur despite heavy rains demanding citizenship for the deprived Madhesis . They demanded to resolve this problem according to the recommendations of Mahantha Thakur Commission. A memorandum was handed to the Chief District Officer of Dhanusha to forward it to the Government of Nepal.

The rally was attended by members of professional organisations, political parties, social organisations and civic society.

Under the active leadership of the "Democratic Madheshi Society, Janakpur (Loktantric Madheshi Samaj, Janakpur)" a well-informed mass rally has adopted this memorandum on 7th of June, 2006 and decided to draw the attention of prime minister and house of representatives for the earliest and sincere attention.

The memorandum is attached herewith.

Prof. Dr R K Shah, Loktantrik Madhesi Samj, Kathmandu, Nepal


MEMORANDUM

Honorable Prime Minister,

Government of Nepal,

Singh Durbar, Kathmandu.

Through: Chief District Officer, Dhanusha.

Subject: To provide citizenship to Madheshi Nepalese people deprived of the same and amend the voter list accordingly before the election of constituent assembly.

Rt. Hon’ble Prime Minister,

The problem of citizenship related to 4 million Madhesi people, who are compelled to live in distressful and a tragic plight being stateless in their own country, is well known to you and need not any elaboration. Millions of Madheshi people particularly youth are being denied of basic human rights and opportunities, higher education, employment and are forced to live in inhumane, derogatory and humiliating environment. There are no rhymes or any reason, which can justify such painful indiscrimination. To force the people to live in a stateless situation without inherent and natural basic human rights is really a shameful crime. Here we recall the public address of honourable Prime minister in a mass rally at “Baraha Bigha (Rangbhumi) Public Ground Janakpur” making a commitment “to provide citizenship to all residing in Nepal, fixing /finalizing a base year and timeline, at the earliest”. It is still to be honoured and situation has turned to worse.

Before the unfortunate and unwarranted regressive royal takeover “Mahanth Thakur Commission” was constituted to study in detail and analyze the citizenship problem and it has forwarded certain remedial measures and recommendations. The “then cabinet” had accepted the study and recommendation report and decided to implement it but it could not be done due to the evil design of some communal anti-madheshi and antinational elements.

Constitution of the country is the fountainhead of the laws and byelaws should be adopted on the basis of constitution is unquestioned but in the constitution of Nepal 2047,clause 8 and 9 related to citizenship is based on Nepal citizenship law 2020, has created a situation which is discriminatory, unjust and shameful for Madheshis. The reason behind it can be easily understood because Madheshi representation was totally lacking in the making of the constitution of Nepal, 2047. At the moment, the country is on the verge of adopting a constitution through the elected constituent assembly, if more than 4 million people could not exercise their voting right, the assembly will be meaningless and thus formed constituent assembly will definitely fail to protect the rights of the Madhesi Nepalese people and it will be a futile exercise, therefore.

The clause 6 of HOR proclamation-2006, which assumed absolute power as bye-product of the glorious people revolution 2006, has promised earliest solution of citizenship-problem. Thus the above said clauses of the constitution are bound to be ineffective and deleted with immediate effect according to article 9(c) of HOR proclamation-2006.

We demand to provide citizenship immediately to the 4 million madheshis and their inclusion in the voter list for the constituent assembly, which should be shaped on the basis of constituency based on uniform proportionate representation of the people with one man- one vote principle.

(Under the active leadership of the “Democratic Madheshi Society (Loktantric Madheshi Samaj)” a well-informed mass rally has adopted this memorandum on 7th of June, 2006 and decided to draw the attention of prime minister and house of representatives for earliest and sincere attention.)



संविधानसभाको निर्वाचनमा मधेशीहरुको समानुपातिक सहभागिता नभए जनविद्रोह गर्ने चेतावनी मधेशी राजनीतिज्ञ तथा बुद्धिजीवीहरुले दिएका छन्।

लोकतन्त्र, शान्ति र मानवअधिकार सञ्जाल धनुषाद्वारा बुधबार जनकपुरमा आयोजित कार्यशाला गोष्ठीका सहभागीहरुले मधेशी समस्या समाधानका लागि राज्यले अझै ठोस पहल नगरे मुलुक अर्को भीषण युद्धको चपेटामा पर्ने चेतावनी पनि दिए।

गोष्ठीमा कार्यपत्र प्रस्तुत गर्दै नेपाल पत्रकार महासंघ धनुषाका सचिव राजशेकुमार कर्णले मुलुकमा रहेका २ सय ५ संसदीय क्षेत्रलाई संविधानसभाको लागि बढाएर ५ सय पुर्‍याउनु पर्ने तर्क दिंदै ५० हजारको जनसंख्यामा १ जना सदस्यको व्यवस्था हुनुपर्ने धारणा व्यक्त गर्नुभयो। उहाँले सेना, प्रहरी, सशस्त्र प्रहरी, निजामती क्षेत्र लगायतमा मधेशीहरुको संख्या न्यून रहेको उल्लेख गर्दै ४० लाख मधेसीलाई नागरिकताबाट वञ्चित गरेको आरोप लगाउनुभयो।

माओवादीका धनुषा सेक्रेटरी राजेशले शोसक र सामन्तविरुद्ध सशक्तरुपमा आन्दोलन नभएसम्म मधेशी, दलित तथा अन्य पिछडिएका जनजातिहरुले अधिकार नपाउने धारणा व्यक्त गर्नुभयो।

चिकित्सक डा. विजयकुमार सिंहले मधेशीले लोकतन्त्रको पक्षमा निर्णायक भूमिका निर्वाह गर्दै आए पनि अहिलेसम्मका सरकारले उपेक्षा गर्दै आइरहेको आरोप लगाउनुभयो।

नेकपा एमाले जनकपुर अञ्चल समन्वय समितिका सदस्य शीतल झाले मधेशको बाहुल्यताबाट मधेशी मात्र निर्वाचित हुने वातावरण बनाउनुपर्नेमा जोड दिनुभयो।

गोष्ठीमा नेपाली कांग्रेस धनुषाका उपसभापति केशव ढुङ्गेल, नेपाल सदभावना पार्टी (आनन्दीदेवी) धनुषाका अध्यक्ष रामगोविन्द यादव, जनमोर्चा नेपालका गौतम ढुङ्गेल, अधिवक्ता जयकिशोर लाभ लगायतले बोल्नुभएको स्वतन्त्र समाचार सेवाले जनाएको छ। www.parewa.com 7 June 2006 (1750 NST)

MaDaMaJa
मधेशीसँग संख्या छ, शिक्त छैन
No Short Cuts: Madhesis Will Have To March
Madhesi Rights: Total Equality
My Most Controversial Blog Post To Date: On Madhesi Issue
Aire Gaire Natthu Khaire Pahadis
First ANTA NYC Event, Times Square Marriott
ये तो क्रान्ित है
Constituent Assembly: 300 Seats Of Roughly Equal Population
Hridayesh Tripathy Released
Dinesh Tripathi, Your Worst Nightmare

Monarchy, Army, Federalism


All eight parties are going to have to take a clear stand on these three burning issues and then go to the people, and let the people decide what is what. The seven parties and the Maoists are going to have to let the people have the final say. Free and fair elections have to be organized, and the people's verdict has to be final.

Interim Arrangement

The UML wants the Maoists to dissolve their local governments. I can see why. At the ballot box, these two parties will be competing for some of the same votes. That is why. And the Maoists want the House to be dissolved. They are not represented in the House, that is why.

A compromise has to be sought. The parties are talking about it like the interim government is to last for a few years. That should not be the case.

Constituent Assembly Elections Before Dashain

My proposal has been to form eight party governments at all levels. You start with the House. Expand it so as to increase its size from 205 to 270. Give 40 seats to the Maoists, and invite them into the cabinet.

40 Seats For Maoists, 25 For Others

At the local levels - village, town, city, district - form eight party governments as well. But if there are places where all eight parties don't exist, only parties that are around will get represented. There are districts where only the Koirala Congress, the UML, the Maoists and the Deuba Congress exist. Such will have four party governments.

Such an arrangement will also cement the eight party unity. That unity is still needed. There still might be regression. There might be anarchy. We already have experienced some of it.

The eight parties have to stick together for democracy. If they could do it in April when it was much tougher, they can do it today.

Those who fear the Maoists on the democracy issue, this will be their chance to "educate" the Maoists on the fundamentals of democratic decision making.

Monarchy

The Maoists, the UML and the Jana Morcha are for a republic. Girija Koirala is for a ceremonial monarchy. I wish all eight parties came out for a republic. But if that not be coming, each party has to follow the democratic process inside their respective parties to let their cadres decide on the party's formal stand. The party president may not impose himself on his cadres like Girija is trying to do.

Say a few parties opt for a ceremonial monarchy, and the rest go for a republic. In the constituent assembly, the camp that has the majority vote will win. If the majority might be for a republic, the country becomes one.

And if this issue gets contentious, we can always hold a referendum on this topic. The constituent assembly could pass a resolution to that effect.

Let the people decide.

Federalism

The Maoists and the Sadbhavana are for federalism. The two Congress parties, the UML and the Jana Morcha have not yet formally endorsed federalism.

Girija Koirala is not in tune with the April Revolution. Or he would not be talking in terms of a ceremonial monarchy and decentralization, code word for being against federalism. If there was one chorus during the April Revolution, it was that of a republic. Girija obviously did not hear it. He was indoors.

Not only do the parties have to take a stand for or against federalism, those who come out for federalism also have to spell out what form of federalism they have in mind.

My personal proposal is not ethnic but economic. I am for three states, Kosi, Gandaki, Karnali. And with strong districts. The Sadbhavana is for five states, Eastern Terai, Western Terai, Eastern Hills, Western Hills, and Kathmandu Valley. The Maoists have eight states in mind.

The Bahuns in the leadership positions in the large parties want decentralization along the lines of the five development regions.

My position is a compromise position between the Maoists and the Sadbhavana at one end, and the Bahuns at the other.

Proposed Republican Constitution 2006

But it is for the people to decide.

Army

This is tricky.

I started out by saying we should dismantle both the armies and be done with it.

Dismantle The Two Armies

I still think that would be a good idea. Or we could have a small army, raise it from scratch. I think the army as an issue has to be treated just like the monarchy and federalism issues. Each party has to take a clear stand, and then go to the people.

How big do you think the army should be? 30,000? 50,000? 100,000? What should its ethnic and gender compositions be?

I would go for an army that is 30,000 strong, or 0.1% of the national population. And it should be an army raised from scratch, and it should look like Nepal. As in, it should be 50% women. It should be 40-50% Madhesi, it should be 20% Dalit, it should be 37% Janajati, it should be 20% Bahun Chhetri.

How do you get there?

You separate the soldiers from the two armies from their guns. All such guns will become the property of the future Nepal Army. And then pass a law to make it illegal for anyone to own such guns who might not be in the army.

Keep both the armies in barracks. Keep them occupied, perhaps with physical training, perhaps with language clases, classes in human rights, classes in vocational skills.

Hold constituent assembly elections. Then raise an army from scratch according to the winning formula, the one that the people voted for.

According to my formula, the most qualified 30,000 would get selected. But people not in the two armies will also be eligible to compete, and especially to help engineer the desired gender and ethnic and caste compositions.

Interestingly, the Maoists are the ones who have come out agreeing with the idea of separating the soldiers from their guns. The seven parties and the Nepal Army have not even taken a look at the idea.

In The News

PM Koirala meets Indian President NepalNews
India ‘ready’ to announce special aid package for Nepal
NFDN demands equal opportunity for persons with disabilities
Govt forms committee to amend educational policies; provides scholarship to martyrs' offspring
Women, Conflict and UN Resolution 1325
Mahara warns of talks breakdown if parliament is not dissolved He assured that even if the talks failed, his party would not return to jungle but would launch a peaceful agitation.
US hints on removal of terrorist tag on Maoists
Indian PM Singh breaks tradition, receives Koirala at Delhi airport

Intellectuals shocked over govt reluctance Kantipur Publications
Dissolving House meaningless: Nemwang
US ready to help create conducive atmosphere
Maoists take away 150 students
Maoists ask contractors to share revenue
Nakkhu jail inmates take jailer under control
NC cadre's son meets mysterious death
Nepal to seek Rs 75b for five years
प्रधानमन्त्रीको भव्य स्वागत
सेनालाई नागरिक नियन्त्रणमा ल्याउने प्रक्रिया पारदर्शी हुनुपर्छ'
वार्ता स्थगित हुनसक्छ ः महरा
भावी नेपालबारे नागरिक सम्मेलन
एकताकेन्द्रमा विवाद मोहनविक्रमद्वारा बहुमत अस्वीकार
स्थानीयमा जनप्रतिनिधि
प्रतिनिधिसभा पुनःस्थापनाको प्रयोजन
INTERVIEW WITH BIDHYA BHANDARI
Interview with Krishna Bahadur Mahara
Interview with Ashok Sharma
INTERVIEW WITH PRADIP NEPAL
INTERVIEW WITH TSRING RHITAR SHERPA
INTERVIEW WITH MADHAV KUMAR NEPAL
Interview with Girija Prasad Koirala
INTERVIEW WITH KANISHKA CHAUGAIN
Interview with Lily Thapa
INTERVIEW WITH NARA HARI ACHARYA

Nepal parliament could rein in Crown Prince India eNews.com, India

Visitors

5 June14:39Qwest Communications Int., Minneapolis, United States
5 June14:43Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, United States

5 June14:47Trinity College, Hartford, United States

5 June15:13Deutsche Telekom AG, Germany
5 June15:18PlusNet Technologies Ltd., United Kingdom
5 June15:29CTX Mortgage Company, Dallas, United States
5 June15:39Duke University, Durham, United States
5 June15:44Telefónica SA, Spain
5 June15:51Singapore (singa.pore.net)

5 June15:51United States (nosc.mil)
5 June15:52Comcast Communications, Rutherford, United States
5 June16:25Smart Telecom Holdings, Ireland
Page views yesterday 176
Page views yesterday 245
1.7 June04:54Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd, India
2.7 June05:12Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd, India
5.7 June05:17Nepal (wlink.com.np)
6.7 June05:27Nepal (wlink.com.np)
7.7 June05:33Nepal (wlink.com.np)
8.7 June05:54Nepal (wlink.com.np)
9.7 June05:54Spectra Net Ltd, India
10.7 June06:01Nepal (wlink.com.np)
11.7 June06:43Philippines (gsilink.ph)
12.7 June06:44Bharti Enterprises, India
13.7 June06:53OptusNet, Australia
14.7 June06:56OptusNet, Australia
15.7 June06:57Mahanagar Telephone Nigam, India
17.7 June07:01Nepal (wlink.com.np)
18.7 June07:01OptusNet, Australia
19.7 June07:02Nepal (wlink.com.np)
20.7 June07:05Nepal (wlink.com.np)
7 June07:15ETC, United Arab Emirates
7 June07:17PCCW IMS Netvigator, Hong Kong S.A.R.
29.7 June07:28France Telecom, France
30.7 June07:28KNIC, Korea
31.7 June07:29Swisscomm, Switzerland
33.7 June07:37Bharti British Telecom Internet Limited, India
34.7 June08:19Nepal (wlink.com.np)
35.7 June08:21Nepal (wlink.com.np)
36.7 June08:51Internet Qatar, Qatar
38.7 June09:09National Internet Backbone, India
39.7 June09:18BB Technologies Corp., Japan
7 June09:36Brasil Telecom, Brazil
42.7 June09:42Road Runner, New York, United States
43.7 June09:57BB Technologies Corp., Japan