An Open Letter To Gagan Thapa

Gaganji.

We just talked on the phone at length, and we agreed that I will write you an open, public letter.

As you know and as the world knows, I have great respect and admiration for you. I have greatly enjoyed your company in person, over email and on the phone. I think you are a great guy. Your love for Nepal is amazing. Your commitment to a republic is not born out of anger, or vengeance. Literacy is good for the Nepali people, and so is a republic. That is where you come from. You have the brains, the heart for a great political career ahead of you, I believe.

King Of India
30 Minutes With Amrit Bohra
Video Blogging
The King Is Nowhere Close To Seeing The Light
Money, Message, Organization
कांग्रेसले रोज्नुपर्ने बाटो
Khim Lal Bhattarai Arrested
Tea, Coffee Or Soda?
लोकतान्त्रिक गणतन्त्र नै किन?
Trent Lott And Gyanendra Shaha
Maoists Should Go Beyond Ceasefire To Peaceful Mobilization
Major Revisions
Gagan Thapa's Right To Free Speech
Gagan's Talk In New York
A Day In The Life Of Gagan Thapa
The Man, The Myth, The Legend: Gagan Thapa
Gagan Thapa October 22 Saturday 2 PM Columbia University
Gagan Thapa Talk In Boston: Two Hours Audio
Gagan Thapa US Tour
Gagan Thapa Amerika Tour
Renaming The Blog In Honor Of Gagan's Release
Gagan Thapa Released
Chargesheeting Gagan: This Regime Has Gone Berserk
Gagan Thapa Feels Unsafe In Jail
Gagan Thapa Case Taken To The United Nations
Gagan Thapa Arrested Again
Gagan Thapa Arrested, Deuba Re-Arrested

I admire your commitment to the Nepali Congress. It is just that it has been utterly foolish of the Nepali Congress leadership to not admire it as well. They rained on your parade and disrupted the Nepal Students Union convention in Pokhara (Anatomy Of The Conflict In Pokhara, Girijaspeak: When Republicans Are Royalists) and subsequently actively sidelined you from that organization such that ever since you have only been an ordinary member of that organization. That is also your status in the party. The majority of the mediocre in that organization is not capable of imagining a vibrant future for Nepal: that is what it boils down to.

During the April Revolution the seven party leaders were not out in the streets, you were. Two thirds of Nepal is younger than you. You are not really that young. You are old enough for national politics.

My first choice would be for the Nepali Congress to come around to the agenda of a Democratic Republic and to give you a ticket for the constituent assembly elections so you end up in the assembly, the parliament. I know that is what you hope happens. I hope that happens. But I just don't see either of those two happening. People who can't even see you as NSU President are not going to be able to imagine you as a parliamentarian. There is something to be said to facing reality as opposed to wishing it were not so.

Long story short, I think we should launch the Nepal chapter of Hamro Nepal in your leadership. It will start as a nationwide organization that could become a full fledged party. You call up a convention of your nationwide network when time is ripe to launch it as a political party. In the mean time you work the phone to set up the local chapters across the nation. You pay a few visits. 62 of the 75 NSU district chiefs were behind you. Maybe they will launch the district chapters.

The king was not able to scare us. Entrenched politicians should not be able to either. Vagueness is their weapon. We should have the guts to see through their mist.

There is an urgent need for a political party that is not communist but that is staunchly republican. Hamro Nepal would fill that vacuum. Right to property is like right to free speech: a fundamental human right. It is also basic to ensuring rapid economic growth. There is a need for a party that understands social and economic justice, but that also understands that democracy and market are like electricity and magnetism. Can't separate the two. Most of the wealth and jobs get created in the private sector. On the other hand, the party would put an emphasis on human capital - namely education, health and micro credit - like no communist has done before. The idea is to put human capital on the same footing as physical capital and financial capital.

I believe the April Revolution has given Nepal an opportunity to shoot for a cutting edge democracy such that the April Revolution can stand in the same league as the October Revolution in Russia, the French Revolution, the American Revolution, and the Indian Struggle For Independence. But whether or not we will qualify will depend on if or not we can give an original twist to the concept of democracy in our next constitution. I think we should shoot for a democracy where parties do not get to raise funds, instead they get state funds in direct proportion to the number of votes they earn, and they keep all their book keeping online.

All country chapters of Hamro Nepal are to stay autonomous. And likely it will take the form of a political party only in Nepal. And so the Nepal chapter will get to have the driving seat, if such might exist. The idea is not to have the remote control in New York City. There will be an open, democratic structure for decision making right there. It is just that I think it is foolish to ignore the global network of the Nepali diaspora. I expect that network to be the number one source for Foreign Direct Investment in Nepal once the policy framework for the same has been put in place. In some ways the diaspora are the cream of the crop, and Nepal deserves to benefit from that spread. Got to milk the cow of globalization, and the cow of internet.

Hamro Nepal has three broad goals: Democratic Republic for Nepal, rapid economic growth for Nepal, and voting rights for the 100,000 Nepalis in America. That third item can be similarly understood by the chapters in other countries, or it can simply mean political empowerment.

If reality might force us to launch our own party, it is better to start on it sooner rather than later. But even if your current strategy of pressuring the Congress from the outside is to be effectively implemented, we still need a formal organization.

So I suggest we launch Hamro Nepal as a non profit political organization in Nepal, and keep alive the threat of turning it into a political party, if only to turn up the heat. But let the threat be real. We will do it if we will have to.

And let's get on Skype or Google Talk. Telephone is expensive. Rs 10 per hour is cheaper than 33 cents a minute. So we can talk as frequenly and as much as we might need to. Online we all live in the same country.

The thing about Hamro Nepal is not just its cutting edge political, social and economic agenda, but also its innovative organizational ways, its emphasis on egalitarianism and transparency. More on that later.

Proposed Republican Constitution 2006
Janata Dal Constitution

Zimbabwe: The Constitution Is Faulty
Zimpundit: Zimbabwe

The Revolution Is Very Much On
18 Days Of April Revolution: Victory
Nepal Has Hit The World Headlines

Hamro Nepal, Latest
Demoblog: World's First Digital Org Now Has a Constitution
Demoblog: Hamro Nepal: The World's First Digitial Democracy Organization
Democracy Spreading Mechanism
The Demosphere Manifesto
Hamro Nepal: Draft Constitution
Organization: Hamro Nepal
Your Many Identities

Immigrant Power
May 1 Immigrants Rally: Great American Boycott With Jesse Jackson 3
May 1 Immigrants Rally: Great American Boycott With Jesse Jackson 2
May 1 Immigrants Rally: Great American Boycott With Jesse Jackson

In The News

Govt announces ceasefire; removes red corner notice, terrorist tag on Maoists NepalNews
UML forms team to talk with Maoists
Leaders caution ministers not to disobey the agendas of seven political parties

Boucher holds one-on-one with Karan Singh Kantipur Publications
'Royalists' threat' to Yechuri, Tripathy, Raja?
US to support new govt, outcome of constituent assembly
INTERVIEW WITH PRADIP NEPAL
UML forms teams for dialogue, new constitution
Students protest against SPA leaders
एमालेमा मन्त्रिमण्डल विवाद
गणराज्य अभियान घोषणा
संविधानसभाका खाकाहरू

Nepal Government Matches Rebel Cease-Fire Voice of America
India, US discuss democracy in Nepal Times of India, India
Nepal Government dissolves Municipal bodies NewKerala.com, India
Nepal Govt, Maoists indulge in torture: United Nations expert NewKerala.com, India

Visitors

Page views yesterday291

3 May

13:18

Radford University, Radford, United States

3 May

13:18

University of California, Riverside, United States

3 May

13:43

Taiwan Network Info. Center, Taiwan

3 May

13:50

Cablecom AG, Switzerland

3 May

13:50

The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, United States

3 May

13:51

United States (dickinson.edu)

3 May

13:51

Intel Corporation, United States

3 May

13:51

The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, United States

13:56Iowa State University, Ames, United States

3 May

13:57

Nepal (wlink.com.np)

3 May

13:58

Fannie Mae, Washington, D.C., United States

3 May

13:58

State of North Carolina, Raleigh, United States

3 May

14:05

Netvision Ltd, Israel

3 May

14:07

Computer Associates, Islandia, United States

3 May

14:08

Harvard University, Cambridge, United States

3 May

14:09

Nepal (wlink.com.np)

3 May

14:13

Nepal (wlink.com.np)

Busiest day so far	21 April 2006
	Page views	1069

Zimbabwe: The Constitution Is Faulty

Zimpundit: Zimbabwe

I am a relatively new student of Zimbabwe politics, and I am not going to pretend I know a whole lot. But even a perfunctory glance at the situation has lead me to believe the fundamental flaw of the democracy movement there is that it hopes to win the 2008 presidential race. That is a self-defeating goal.

Mugabe is a dictator, he has been a dictator. His dictatorship has been made possible by a constitution that needs to go. The goal of the democracy movement should be to boycott the 2008 elections. The goal should be to prepare to launch a democracy movement to form an all party government to conduct free and fair elections to a constituent assembly to write a new, democratic constitution. The goal has to be to get people out in large numbers, to shut the country down for a few weeks.

The First Major Revolution Of The 21st Century Happened In Nepal
Democracy Spreading Mechanism
The Demosphere Manifesto
5 Steps To Democracy
Proposed Constitution

The guidelines presented in the links above are all open source. They can be and should be modified to make sense for the local circumstances. It is just that all such debates should take place in the open, online. When they take place offline, they should be documented and archived online.

All of Mugabe's elections have been fundamentally flawed. That is how he has managed to stay in power for so long. You do not participate in a Mugage election, you boycott it. If you participate, you rubber stamp his dictatorship and wrong ways.

I am honored to have been in constant communication with Zimpundit after the April Revolution. He is in America like I am. He is also a Global Voices author, like I am. He has strong feelings for democracy and for his country of origin. We are going to collaborate more closely for the sake of Zimbabwe. This is taking digital democracy activism to a whole new level. All that you can do online, you do online. The online medium is such an efficient medium. Zim, I am in.

Zimbabwe: Constitution

There is a provision for a foreign woman to become a citizen of Zimbabwe if she marries a man who is a citizen of the country. What about foreign men? This is sexist. Only children adopted by men get citizenship. That is wrong. There is all this talk of "legitimate" children. All children are legitimate. I get the impression Zimbabwe is still one of those countries where single mothers are seriously frowned upon. That is sexist and wrong.

There is a declaration of rights, but those rights are subject to their being in the "public interest." As in, if the government deems your exercise of a particular right against the public interest, that right might get curtailed. It is with this escape clause that Mugabe has been hounding his opponents for decades. It is this climate of fear that has sustained him. He does not care to be loved and admired. He just wants to be feared. It sure has worked for him: "rights and freedoms subject to such limitations of that protection as are contained herein, being limitations designed to ensure that the enjoyment of the said rights and freedoms by any person does not prejudice the rights and freedoms of others or the public interest."

The public interest is such a vague, loose phrase. That is practically like the government having veto power over individuals.

The state can legally kill you "for the purpose of suppressing a riot, insurrection or mutiny or of dispersing an unlawful gathering." That is another dose of blanket power in Mugabe's hands.
The state can lawfully kill you to prevent you from possibly committing a crime: "in order to prevent the commission by that person of a criminal offence." That falls in the sci-fi zone, as far as I am concerned.

A person can be deprived of liberty "upon reasonable suspicion of his having committed, or being about to commit, a criminal offence." So you could get arrested if you are about to organize a rally that might turn into a riot? The lines are blurry.

You could also be detained "in execution of the order of a court or with the consent of his parent or guardian, for the purposes of his education or welfare during a period beginning before he attains the age of twenty-one years and ending not later than the date when he attains the age of twenty-three years." That is like saying you are 18, but you are not yet an adult.

Also "for the purpose of preventing the spread of an infectious or contagious disease." This is suspicious.

Also "if he is, or is reasonably suspected to be, of unsound mind, addicted to drugs or alcohol, or a vagrant, for the purpose of his care, treatment or rehabilitation or the protection of the community." The state gets to decide if you are of unsound mind. What if you organize an insurrection? Is that the act of an unsound mind? There is this tone that the state is doing it for your own good. That is so patronizing.

Also "for the purpose of preventing his unlawful entry into Zimbabwe or for the purpose of effecting his expulsion, extradition or other lawful removal from Zimbabwe." I can imagine this might apply to political dissidents.

"Any person who is arrested or detained shall be informed as soon as reasonably practicable, in a language that he understands, of the reasons for his arrest or detention and shall be permitted at his own expense to obtain and instruct without delay a legal representative of his own choice and hold communication with him." It does not say 24 hours. As soon as possible could be really long, especially if you are a targeted individual. And legal representation is not provided by the state. If you can't afford it, you don't have it. This is fundamental abuse.

There is a provision that "No person shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading punishment or other such treatment." But then the subsequent provision makes that null and void: "No treatment reasonably justifiable in the circumstances of the case to prevent the escape from custody of a person who has been lawfully detained shall be held to be in contravention of subsection (1) on the ground that it is degrading." Every time there is a mention of some kind of a fundamental right, there is always an escape clause that gives the state veto power.

Mugabe seems to have imposed a threat of physical harm upon the population. He has instilled fear. The people of Zimbabwe have not been a free people.

"Where any person, by virtue of a law, contract or scheme relating to the payment of pensions benefits, has a right, whether vested or contingent, to the payment of pensions benefits or any commutation thereof or a refund of contributions, with or without interest, payable in terms of such law, contract or scheme, any law which thereafter provides for the extinction of or a diminution in such a right shall be regarded for the purposes of subsection (1) as a law providing for the acquisition of a right in property." Is this like saying the government can rob you of your pension?

There are other provisions that basically challenge the right to property. You may own property, but the state has final say.

The purpose of a democratic constitution is to protect the individual from the state. The purpose of an autocratic institution is to protect the state from the individual. The Zimbabwe constitution falls in the second category.

The Zimbabwe constitution does not seem to be able to think of one fundamental human right that it does not want to smother beyond recognition. If rights are presented with ifs and buts, they are not rights at all.

I have made these comments after having read just the first one seventh of the document. This has been enough to convince me that the goal of the democracy movement should be to scrap this constitution.

The language of the document is rather convoluted. I am sorry if I misread or misunderstood some parts. I stand corrected. But these are my first impression complaints. This document is too flawed to be amended. It needs to be scraped to make way for something new.

On The Web

Movement for Democratic Change Online
ZIMBABWE: Democracy movement debates sanctions
The Zimbabwe Movement -- Homepage -- Get involved today!!
Zvakwana - Sokwanele - Enough is Enough - Home Page
World Movement for Democracy - Promoting Labor Rights
World Movement for Democracy - Breakthrough Elections
Frontline 7 - Zimbabwe: for democracy and socialism
modified - Report by Social Movement observer delegation to ...
Cuba
Report by Social Movement observer delegation to Zimbabwe

All you need to know about Arthur Mutambara
Mutambara outlines new MDC focus
ZWNEWS.com - linking the world to Zimbabwe
ISS Today: Arthur Mutambara Returns to Head MDC
allzimbabwe.com - Strive Masiyiwa Snubs Pro-Senate MDC and settle ...
MLK Visiting Professors welcomed - MIT News Office
_ Africa Leadership Initiative ::: _ List of Fellows
Zimbabwes Biggest Daily Online Newspaper - read it here first ...
BBC NEWS | World | Africa | Zimbabwe's 'outsider' faction leader
Arthur Mutambara - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia






morocco vs zimbabwe hadji27 18 sec - Jan 17, 2006
Africa - Botswana & Zimbabwe Animals and Landscapes Pinkard Alan Brand/PhotoLogik 3 min 8 sec - Dec 31, 2005
Zimbabwe Botswana Scenes Pinkard Alan Brand/PhotoLogik 3 min 9 sec - Dec 31, 2005
Nigeria Vs Zimbabwe KEMIS3 13 min 14 sec - Apr 15, 2006
H.E. Robert Gabriel Mugabe: Opening Remarks 4th African-African American Summit AFRICAN CONNECTIONS 4 min 39 sec - May 1, 1997