Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Anand Bist, Troublemaker









Anand Bist is among the most active Nepalis in the US in the democracy movement. I have met him many times since I have been in New York City. And we stay in regular touch, over the phone and over email. I was talking to him last night, in anticipation of the symposium on Saturday, and he told me a few stories about him that really got my attention. So I told him I wanted to talk to him in person so I could write a profile on him at my blog. He has Mondays and Tuesdays off. After I got his email saying he was available today, I called him and we arranged to meet in Jackson Heights. I drove there. I barely skipped the evening rush hour traffic. Parking before 7 PM is one hour at a time, so I had to keep coming back to pop in more quarters into the meter. I did that thrice.

We met first at Subhash Lama's wireless phone shop in the basement of the Eagle movie theater. Lama is president of the Tamang Society. Then we walked over to the office of Nepal Khabar, the new Nepali weekly in town. There we met up with Bishwa Shah. The office is over the Yak restaurant. The owner of the restaurant also dropped by. He was to fly off to Nepal in a day or two. So Anand handed him the letter that he had composed to send to Girija Koirala.

Now there are two Nepali language papers out of New York City, Nepali Aawaz and Nepal Khabar. I met up with Kashish Shrestha, the editor of the Aawaz, Sunday evening. Our talk was mostly political.

There are two new papers also out of DC. Aawaz seems to have opened up the floodgates.

Then we moved on to the Kabab place. There we met up with Banshalal Tamang of Sindhupalchok and also a new arrival from Gorakha, a Nepali Congress veteran who was two years junior to Baburam Bhattarai at high school.

It has been quite an evening. Anand also has put me in touch with some people in Ridgewood, people like Madan Gyawali. Looks like a lot of Nepalis live there. It is Ridgewood, Elmhurst, and Jackson Heights.

Anand Bist is a doer, a go-getter. He comes across as impatient, he talks fast. Sometimes he can sound incoherent. It is because he has a lot on his mind, a lot of phone calls to make, a lot of people to meet, a lot to do, and all on top of a full time job. He is a young man in a hurry. He is effective, and has little time for those who will talk endlessly and not do much. This guy is a democrat.

Anand is from Doti. He was born in 1972. He grew up in Dhangadhi. He did his 10 plus two in Dehradoon. During the 1990 movement, he was active in Delhi, which is a little while from Dehradoon, "like DC is from New York City." Two years later he attended the national conference of the Nepal Students Union in Butwal. He was one of the two representatives of the organization from India. He was also active with the NSU at Shankardev Campus in Kathmandu.

He came to the US in 1998 to New York City. Upto 2002 he was active with the various Nepali social organizations. He has consistently helped the new Nepali arrivals with job and apartment searches, with I-20 issues and things like that, as many as he can.

All that changed in 2002 after the parliament got dissolved. His social engagement did not decrease, but his focus became much more political.

"I collected 350 signatures over two weeks to denounce the dissolution of the parliament, the dismissal of Deuba." That hit the headlines with Kantipur. He was decisive when the Congress and the UML were still unsure as to which way to go. Many in those parties were actually happy Deuba was out.

Up to that point, he was one person, there was no organization. He registered the Nepal Democratic Youth Council on December 7, 2002 with the State Department. By now the Council has 25 chapters in the US and nine in other countries. The Council has helped organize six rallies so far, four in DC and two in front of the UN. The Council has lobbied Senators and Congressmen. The next big push is for February 18, we are trying to get Girija Koirala to come here, he said. That is the traditional Democracy Day in Nepal.

The Council provides a platform for the visiting Nepali dignitaries, politicians, artists, human rights activists, and journalists. "Girija Koirala and Sher Bahadur Deuba are the only prominent leaders we have not hosted yet," he says. "We have hosted Madhav Nepal."

His group also helps Nepalis who win DV lotteries but do not have any contacts in the US.

Nepal maganize in Kathmandu once profiled him in a major way. Based on that he gets emails from Nepal from people requesting his help.

At the 2005 ANA Convention in Dallas, he had a minor spat with the Nepali ambassador to the US, Kedar Bhakta Shrestha. The ambassador basically told him he should go back to Nepal if he wants to do politics. Bist told him to mind his own business. The spat hit the headlines in Nepal. "It was front page news in Kantipur."

He gets threatening emails from Nepal. "How long will you stay in the US? When you come back to Nepal, we will take care of you." He has filed a complaint with the FBI with help from Sadai, the prominent Nepali lawyer. That protects him from any threats he might receive from anyone in the US. But threats from Nepal stay on like background radiation.

I asked if any one from his family has been harassed in Nepal. He said no.

The Council has organized 25-30 programs so far.

He would like to take some credit for the idea of organizing gherao programs at Nepali embassies. It was first done in the US. Then it has been copied in Australia, UK, Hong Kong, Belgium.

At this point Subhash Lama interjected that there are a lot of Maoist sympathizer Nepalis in Belgium.

"I am watching the seven parties. Soon it might be time to go for the final, decisive push," Anand said.

The Council does a lot of letter writing. It has also received a lot of letters, from lawmakers and major bodies like the European Commission. He faxed those letters to the Nepali media.

"Except for a handful of Nepalis who benefit from the palace directly, all else are for democracy," he says about the Nepalis in the US. But not all are out in the open because they fear the king might harass their families back home.

He says the Council will also work for Nepali unity. "There are people from many ethnic backgrounds, but all are Nepali."

The Council coordinates with the Alliance for Democracy and Human Rights in Nepal, another major local Nepali organization, but these groups have people who hold leadership positions in both. After democracy arrives, the Council will stay on as a watchdog organization to help democracy grow in the country, Anand says.

Anand claims the 12 point agreement between the Maoists and the seven parties has been a major milestone. That has made it possible for the people to come out into the streets in large numbers. The fear has gone.

We had a minor disagreement. I said it was Deuba not the king who dissolved the parliament in 2002. The king dismissed Deuba six months later, and then invited the formation of an all party government. Up to that point, the king had not done anything wrong. The parties should have taken that offer and then gone for unconditional peace talks with the Maoists to lead to constituent assembly elections, but then at that point in time neither the Congress nor the UML were for a constituent assembly yet. Then I lose him, and after the 2/1 coup, the king has basically become a Third World Dictator.

Anand blames the king for the parliament dissolution.

I asked Anand what could the diaspora do to jack up the movement. He talked in terms of more protest rallies, more events like talk programs, more letter writing, more lobbying of the lawmakers.

But I think all that still falls in the moral support category. More of the same will not be enough. We need to steer the diaspora to provide active logistical support to the movement in Nepal. We need people to donate anywhere between $10 and $1000 to the five projects. And we need people to pose for group photographs to be uploaded at Flickr so as to show thousands of Nepali faces that support the cause of democracy. The diaspora movement needs to go mass based.

Lobbying lawmakers and foreign powers also will only go so far. The king received a personal letter from the most powerful human being on earth itself, President Bush. But he did not budge. A mass movement is the only option.

But all that we get to discuss on Saturday with a larger group of Nepali leaders from all across the country. The five families will be there.

Also this blog is political work, this is not journalism.

And this thing that we are doing on Saturday, why can't we do it online every day, 24/7? There would be no barrier to entry. People would have the option for text, audio (Audioblogger, Blastpodcast) and video (YouTube). That way we can involve 5,000 or more as opposed to 50 people. The movement for democracy has to be mass based. Or perhaps we can do both. Both face time and screen time.

Also, the regime is like a log in the way. Our group dynamics model should be such that every person and organization we can get hold of, we should mak use of. We all need to work together to push the log out of the way. We should watch out for territorial behavior among us. The cause of democracy is bigger than any of us. We all have to work in sync.

Advisors, Doers, Donors, Supporters, Cheerleaders, Spectators, Whiners
Diaspora Dynamics
The Cloud Model, Not The Pyramid Model

Visitors

10 January05:11Deutsche Telekom AG, Germany
10 January10:27Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
10 January10:28Electric Lightwave Inc., United States
10 January10:49Smart Telecom Holdings, Ireland
10 January15:17KORNET, Korea
10 January16:33Barak, Israel
10 January16:46Brasil Telecom, Brazil
10 January17:29University of Wisconsin, Madison, United States
10 January18:34Wanadoo France, Rennes, France
10 January19:14Mariner Systems, Inc., Canada

In The News

RPP undergoes vertical split, dissident faction elects Home Minister Thapa as its new leader NepalNews
NC (D) general convention elects CWC members Uma Adhikari and Dina Upadhyay who contested for the two reserved seats for women also made it to the CWC while Indra Bahadur Gurung and Bhisma Raj Aangdungbe secured the CWC seats allotted for indigenous nationalities and Dal Singh Kami and Umakant Chaudhary and Khimkanta Jha were elected for reserved seats for Dalits and the Terai community respectively. Jeevan Bahadur Shahi was nominated unopposed for the CWC membership from one seat reserved for Karnali region.
Thousands march from Bhaktapur to Kathmandu calling for democracy
Harassment of journos continues in Nepal: RSF
Suspected Maoists bomb Kanchanpur DDC office
Palace Driving Wedge into Political Parties: Nepal NewsLine Nepal, Nepal
Watchdog condemns Nepal’s media harassment Daily Times, Pakistan

Nepali American Public Affairs Council (NAPAC) & America Nepal Friendship Society (ANFS) Present A non-partisan public affairs forum on: (a brainstorming session) Peace and Democracy in Nepal

Nepal is going through one of the most critical times in its recent history. The decade-long armed struggle between the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) and the Royal Nepalese Army has caused tremendous insecurity and instability in the country. King Gyanendra's action of February 1, 2005 has further complicated the sociopolitical situation in Nepal and been met with growing resistance by the political parties. The goal of this day-long discussion is to examine these key players and their impact on democracy and peace in Nepal and the role of the Nepali civil society, diaspora and the international community.

We have chosen three broad themes to guide our discussion.

1. Constructive Role of Monarchy, Political Parties, Civil Society and the Maoists in restoring peace and establishing full democracy

2. Constructive role of International Community in helping restore peace and full democracy in Nepal

3. Constructive role of Nepali Diaspora in bringing peace and establishing full democracy in Nepal

When you come to the event, we encourage you to come up with at least three to five of your own ideas for each of the themes. This will be tremendously helpful to guide our discussion. Please note that we are not planning lectures. Our emphasis is to foster objective and constructive discussions that can accommodate all view points.

WHEN Saturday, January 14, 2006 (From 8.30 am to 5 PM)

Venue Jerome Greene Hall, Room 102 Columbia University Law School, New York, NY 10027 (At the corner of 116 th Street and Amsterdam Ave) (If you are travelling by public transportation, please take No 1 Subway line to 116 th St-Columbia University Station and walk 1 block east.)

In order to participate, please RSVP either to Dr. Shyam Karki at 410-592-9019 /email at nepal1975@yahoo.com or to Dr. Tara Niraula at 212-491-0378/email at drniraula@yahoo.com or visit http://www.napac-usa.org/ny_workshop_registration.php and register.

Additional sponsors of the event are The Nepalese Americas Council America Nepal Society and Nepalese Democratic Youth Council 1

Why Did The Chicken Cross The Road?


Tulsi Giri: "The king must have thus wanted."

Girija Koirala: "That was BP's vision."

Madhav Nepal: "The masses must have thus desired."

Prachanda: "It must have seen the People's Army coming."

Baburam Bhattarai: "As to why, every child here and abroad knows why."

Kirti Nidhi Bishta: "Must have lost deposit."

Bamdev Gautam: "Must not have wished to get buried in the same ditch."

Narahari Acharya: "Must have seen the republic train."

Hridayesh Tripathy: "For the cause of social justice."

Bharat Bimal Yadav: "Mai ka dooth piya hoga to dauda."

Sushil Koirala: "San dai ko ichha hola."

Shailaja Acharya: "Must have been the mainstream."

Gagan Thapa: "Must have happened while I was on my US trip."

Narahari Acharya: "Must have lost the leadership election despite being right."

Ram Sharan Mahat: "What do you want me to do about it?"

KP Oli: "Ta daudyo ta daudyo."

Pradeep Nepal: "Kukhura ko pani ke aukat hunchha?"

Amik Sherchan: "Kasto kura na bujheko tapain le?"

Lilamani Pokharel: "Yaska dui char karan huna sakchhan."

Narayan Man Bijukchhe: "Malai sodhera daudya hoina ta."

CP Mainali: "Yo bado naulo kura sunaunu bhayo tapain le."

Rajendra Mahto: "Uska bhi shoshan ho raha hoga."

Sujata Koirala: "Desh bidesh bata movement ka lagi moral support batulne hatar ho ki?"

King Gyanendra: "To participate in the municipal polls, for the love of the country. "



WHY DID THE CHICKEN CROSS THE ROAD?

Plato: For the greater good.

Karl Marx: It was a historical inevitability.

Machiavelli: So that its subjects will view it with admiration, as a chicken which has the daring and courage to boldly cross the road, but also with fear, for whom among them has the strength to contend with such a paragon of avian virtue? In such a manner is the princely chicken's dominion maintained.

Hippocrates: Because of an excess of light pink gooey stuff in its pancreas.

Jacques Derrida: Any number of contending discourses may be discovered within the act of the chicken crossing the road, and each interpretation is equally valid as the authorial intent can never be discerned, because structuralism is DEAD, DAMMIT, DEAD!

Thomas de Torquemada: Give me ten minutes with the chicken and I'll find out.

Timothy Leary: Because that's the only kind of trip the Establishment would let it take.

Douglas Adams: Forty-two.

Nietzsche: Because if you gaze too long across the Road, the Road gazes also across you.

Oliver North: National Security was at stake.

B.F. Skinner: Because the external influences which had pervaded its sensorium from birth had caused it to develop in such a fashion that it would tend to cross roads, even while believing these actions to be of its own free will.

Carl Jung: The confluence of events in the cultural gestalt necessitated that individual chickens cross roads at this historical juncture, and therefore synchronicitously brought such occurrences into being.

Jean-Paul Sartre: In order to act in good faith and be true to itself, the chicken found it necessary to cross the road.

Ludwig Wittgenstein: The possibility of "crossing" was encoded into the objects "chicken" and "road", and circumstances came into being which caused the actualization of this potential occurrence.

Albert Einstein: Whether the chicken crossed the road or the road crossed the chicken depends upon your frame of reference.

Aristotle: To actualize its potential.

Buddha: If you ask this question, you deny your own chicken- nature.

Howard Cosell: It may very well have been one of the most astonishing events to grace the annals of history. An historic, unprecedented avian biped with the temerity to attempt such an herculean achievement formerly relegated to homo sapien pedestrians is truly a remarkable occurence.

Salvador Dali: The Fish.

Darwin: It was the logical next step after coming down from the trees.

Emily Dickinson: Because it could not stop for death.

Epicurus: For fun.

Ralph Waldo Emerson: It didn't cross the road; it transcended it.

Johann von Goethe: The eternal hen-principle made it do it.

Ernest Hemingway: To die. In the rain.

Werner Heisenberg: We are not sure which side of the road the chicken was on, but it was moving very fast.

David Hume: Out of custom and habit.

Jack Nicholson: 'Cause it (censored) wanted to. That's the (censored) reason.

Pyrrho the Skeptic: What road?

Ronald Reagan: I forget.

John Sununu: The Air Force was only too happy to provide the transportation, so quite understandably the chicken availed himself of the opportunity.

The Sphinx: You tell me.

Mr. T: If you saw me coming you'd cross the road too!

Henry David Thoreau: To live deliberately ... and suck all the marrow out of life.

Mark Twain: The news of its crossing has been greatly exaggerated.

Molly Yard: It was a hen!

Zeno of Elea: To prove it could never reach the other side.

Chaucer: So priketh hem nature in hir corages.

Wordsworth: To wander lonely as a cloud.

The Godfather: I didn't want its mother to see it like that.

Keats: Philosophy will clip a chicken's wings.

Blake: To see heaven in a wild fowl.

Othello: Jealousy.

Dr Johnson: Sir, had you known the Chicken for as long as I have, you would not so readily enquire, but feel rather the Need to resist such a public Display of your own lamentable and incorrigible Ignorance.

Mrs Thatcher: This chicken's not for turning.

Supreme Soviet: There has never been a chicken in this photograph.

Oscar Wilde: Why, indeed? One's social engagements whilst in town ought never expose one to such barbarous inconvenience - although, perhaps, if one must cross a road, one may do far worse than to cross it as the chicken in question.

Kafka: Hardly the most urgent enquiry to make of a low-grade insurance clerk who woke up that morning as a hen.

Swift: It is, of course, inevitable that such a loathsome, filth-ridden and degraded creature as Man should assume to question the actions of one in all respects his superior.

Macbeth: To have turned back were as tedious as to go o'er.

Whitehead: Clearly, having fallen victim to the fallacy of misplaced concreteness.

Freud: An die andere Seite zu kommen. (Much laughter)

Hamlet: That is not the question.

Donne: It crosseth for thee.

Pope: It was mimicking my Lord Hervey.

Constable: To get a better view.