Saturday, November 12, 2005

Maoist, Moriarty, Madhav, Manmohan: Get Behind The 3 Point Program


The Maoists started out with the goal of a communist republic in 1996. This year they did some major homework, and Baburam Bhattarai formally stated that their goal is a democratic republic through a constituent assembly, and that they are willing to disarm if they are offered UN mediation.

Please note some of the things they are saying on their own:
  1. They are willing to disarm.
  2. They want a democratic republic, not a communist republic.
  3. They want to go there through a constituent assembly, not an armed revolution.
And I have proposed a three point program that thankfully Madhav Nepalji has been circulating among his colleagues in the seven party coalition. It is nothing but their own four point program minus the House revival stance.
  1. Seven party interim government.
  2. Peace talks with the Maoists.
  3. Constituent Assembly.
Unlike Moriarty I am for a Democrat-Maoist alliance. That is the best way to tip the balance against the king. That is also the best political solution to the insurgency. Moriarty is on record saying there is no military solution to the insurgency. So I believe he agrees with me. This is not to be an alliance for a communist republic. I am for an alliance of steel for a constituent assembly.

Moriarty's role has not been all too helpful as far as the democrats are concerned. He has not come down heavily upon the king despite the relentless attacks on the media, the NGOs, the civil society and the democrats. You can not preach a king-democrat reconciliation, as Moriarty does, and not see it is the king who is preventing any such possibility. Moriarty also needs to adopt the three point program as the only way out for the country. There is no other way out. Moriarty needs to unequivocally come out in support of the idea of a constituent assembly. Only that clarity will be like applying some pressure upon an autocrat. Otherwise he is aiding and abetting.

The Maoists also need to come out in support of the three point program. The first implication of that is that they inevitably will have to extend their ceasefire by another three months. If the Maoists were to launch another round of civil war, and I do not doubt their ability to do so, they will make it hard to impossible for us democrats to wage a decisive mass movement to unseat this illegitimate regime.

The Maoists need to not limit the democratic space, and need to come out with their own peaceful protests. The second part of the three point program leaves plenty of room for a UN mediation, if that is what the Maoists want.

The three point program of the democrats is the best way for the Maoists to achieve their primary goal, which is a constituent assembly.

Prachanda, Baburam, extend the ceasefire, and join the peaceful protests. Don't mess things up just when the goal looks achievable. Your party has lost too many of its cadres over 10 years for you to now mess things up. If you do not extend the ceasefire, you mess things up. You don't even have to participate in the movement, you just have to stay out of the way.

India also needs to come clearly in support of the three point program. Looks like Gyanendra locked horns with Manmohan on the issue of Afghanistan and China recently. Gyanendra thinks so highly of the Chinese Communist Party, that guy is a closet Maoist, or that is what I think. India needs to understand from its own personal experience this man can not be nudged towards democracy. He knows exactly what he is doing, and he has made it very clear democracy is not his cup of tea. Face reality. See him for what he is: he is an autocrat. The Chinese non-interference the king tries to paint as a sponsorship and support of his regime. The truth is the Chinese are just trying their best to stay neutral. They will be equally friendly to the interim government.

At various times the king also has said he is for an all party government and a constituent assembly. He too has the option to endorse the three point program. He can take the sane option, or invite the wrath of a movement that might become a revolution.

In The News

Maoist threaten CPN-UML leaders Kantipur
NGOs, INGOs code of conduct enforced

A Plant Looking At An Animal


I have thoroughly studied Gyanendra's interviews and speeches given over a period of years and I have come to the firm conclusion this man is an autocrat by upbringing and character. This is someone with a zamindari mentality. He has an ideology, it is called Monarchism. Like Baburam is a Maoist, I am a Democrat, a Progressive, Gyanendra is a Monarchist.

In that ideology there is a king who is above the law, and he has his subjects. Those subjects may not speak against the king. The subjects have no rights other than what the king might have given them in limited forms and might take away at any time. The subjects have no birth rights. The king rules by decree. He has his sycophants and underlings. He treats the state treasury like it were his personal wealth. He probably has an army clique loyal to him. But it is more monetary incentives than loyalty at work.

He is a plant. To him democratic parties and their leaders are animals, a whole different species.
The plant looks at an animal and complains, look, I told you, it moves, it has eyes, it speaks, it eats with the mouth open, it has no roots. No roots!

He criticizes 12 years of democracy. He forgets that Nepal is two years older than America. If Nepal had been born as a democracy like America, it too would have been to the moon by now. This monarch is shameless when he criticizes 12 years of democracy.

He says the democrats were not able to solve the Maoist problem. Deuba got six months, Chand got six. Gyan has had his turn. He needs to resign on grounds of failure. The state is absent in 80% of the national territory.

He talks of corruption. Measured in absolute dollar terms, he is the most corrupt person in Nepal's history. (Somnath Ghimire: King G Is Pinochet)

He accuses the democrats of having competed for power. That is like accusing Bill Gates of wanting to make money. Businessmen work to make money, they compete for market share. Politicians vie to get into power. You compete for the people's votes to acquire the tools of power so you can do good. Look, the animal has eyes. It has legs, it moves.

What he calls bickering among the politicians would be called political dialogue by any sane person.

He accuses the politicians of not loving Nepal like he loves Nepal. It is like someone once said of a butterfly collector, "He loves butterflies so much, he kills them, and then puts them up for display." This king has subjected the country to a slow death.

No roots!

The politicians did not have the option to look at a military solution to the insurgency because the army was still controlled by the king even when the politicians were in power. The politicians did not have the option to look at a political solution because the palace never came forth saying it was okay with the idea of a constituent assembly.

The palace has to take total blame for the insurgency.

A graph has to be drawn showing how many Nepalis lost their lives before and after Gyanendra. Nepalis killed by both sides to the conflict are the responsibility of this king, because he has been in power. He has had the executive authority.

The mayor of New York City takes responsibility for the crime rate in town. He does not get to blame the criminals.

This king is not interested in seeking dialogue with the democrats. Or he would take initiative.

He is not interested in peace, or he would have given a sane response to the Maoist ceasefire.

He is not interested in Nepal's prosperity, or he would hurry up and help end the civil war.

He sure is not interested in democracy. To be interested, he would first have to know what democracy is. He does not. He is a plant looking at an animal. Democracy to him is a foreign concept.

His relentless attacks on the political parties, the civil society, the student leaders, the media, and the NGOs, and the people in general, because all direct attacks on the leaders are an indirect attack on the Nepali people, show this king can only show the face he has, and he has the face of an autocrat.

There is no alternative to a mass movement.

Plants do not understand animals. Animals do not have the option to reason with plants.

In The News

Full Text Of His Majesty King Gyanendra's address to the 13th SAARC Summit NepalNews
Activists call for reducing discrimination to resolve conflicts
Media groups knock the doors of the UN
Nepal-India border sealed ahead of Bihar polls
Court verdict opens door to permanent censorship: CPJ
Kantipur F.M. drops news broadcasts
UML General Secretary meets Koirala in New Delhi
SAARC foreign Ministers propose Economic Union
Bar to boycott bench, FNJ to take to streets
Nepal's King Defends Takeover at Regional Summit and Promises ... Voice of America
Gyanendra justifies Februrary royal coup in Nepal Webindia123
FNJ urges Nepal’s FMs not to stop news broadcasts
Asian Tribune, Thailand
'Nepal stalling Afghanistan's entry into SAARC'
Webindia123, India
EU criticizes repressive media restrictions in Nepal
Islamic Republic News Agency, Iran
Nepal heading towards permanent censorship: CPJ Webindia123
Nepal SC refuses to stop govt from imposing media restrictions Daily Times
Nepal heading towards permanent censorship: CPJ Webindia123
Nepal lawyers to boycott court after media crackdown Webindia123
Nepal Back Home with Maoist Messages
NewsLine Nepal, Nepal
India should re-think its arms embargo on Nepal: Gen. Mehta Nepali Times
SAFMA lashes out at media curbs in Nepal, condemns Delhi blasts
Islamic Republic News Agency, Iran
Nepal scribes approach UN body to protect press freedom
Press Trust of India, India
Journos Call for Pro-active Role of OHCHR to Protect Nepali Media Himalayan Times
Gyanendra imposes curbs on NGOs The Statesman
Nepal, India exchange vetoes
PeaceJournalism.com, Nepal
Unsafe abortion continues to rise in Nepal
People's Daily Online, China
Nationwide protests erupt in Nepal against code of conduct
Asian Tribune, Thailand
Fresh protests in Nepal as king gags NGOs NewKerala.com
UN ‘deeply concerned’ by NGO codes Kathmandu Post
NGOs protest nationwide Kathmandu Post